Monthly Archive for August, 2007Page 2 of 2

Nothing is ever easy

So it would seem triple-booting Vista, XP, and Ubuntu isn’t as easy as I thought it would be. If you’re not a technologically-oriented person (or if you get bored after reading three paragraphs), you’d better give this post a wide berth. Also note that this is not really a tutorial. I simply stumbled through this situation all on my own and take no responsibility for the pain you might feel when you nuke your computer and hit your head repeatedly on the keyboard because you did what I did.

All right, so, because I’m a geek, I decided to take it upon myself to put not one, not two, but three operating systems on my laptop. It started when I got a new hard drive and completely wiped all the Dell crap off of it so I could install Vista and Ubuntu. I couldn’t do this before because I had some weird partitioning going on with my hard drive due to the presence of Dell MediaDirect. As such, I couldn’t make enough partitions (one primary for the OS and one extended/logical for swap space) to put Linux on. After nuking MediaDirect, I was able to get things started. This was easy. Vista was already installed, so all I had to do was make some space and pop in the Ubuntu Live CD. It installed GRUB (the Linux bootloader), which automatically picked up Vista and let me boot to it just fine.

Continue reading ‘Nothing is ever easy’

Sphere: Related Content

I’m rantless

Perhaps you’ve noticed a lack of new material here at Mad Rants. My computer projects notwithstanding (I’m working on triple-booting my laptop with Windows Vista, Windows XP, and Ubuntu Linux…just for the heck of it), there’s just nothing I’ve found worthy of ranting about. Celebrity news (always a goldmine) has petered down since Paris got out of jail and Lindsay turned herself in, and I can’t think of any good rants to go with the current escapades of our dear old government (even though they’re still allowed to listen in on me arguing with the computer repairman in India and send me to Gitmo because the name of my graphics card rhymes with “plastic explosive” or somesuch).

It would appear that I’m simply in a slump. I do that a lot, actually. Post three days out of every week for a month and then it’s once every three weeks. Maybe I should resort to putting up YouTube clips I find funny. Hey, if Ration Reality can get away with it, I can too.

Sphere: Related Content

In God who trusts?

For a very, very long time, the official motto of the United States was E Pluribus Unum, a Latin phrase meaning “out of many, one.” In 1956, it was changed to In God We Trust, an English phrase meaning “there’s only one real religion in this country, dammit!”

This wasn’t the only religion-oriented change made in the 1950s. That was the same decade the Pledge of Allegiance gained “under God,” angering atheist kids and secular humanist parents the nation over. On the bright side, no one was required to do the Hitler (née Bellamy) salute any more (I’m serious, that’s what they did when they said the Pledge back before World War II; Wikipedia sez so). At any rate, why was Christianity so zealously promoted during these times? Easy: the Cold War. I’m certainly not the first to point out the connection, so don’t go telling people I made this all up. The common conception of the time was that Communists were evil. Soviet Russia was Communist and highly atheistic. Ergo, atheists were evil. To combat the evil, godlessness of the Communists, the United States promoted Christianity, ostensibly to show the world that America was the source of everything good, such as apple pie and Playboy, because we had God on our side.

History will record that Russia disintegrated and America won the Cold War. But did the Christianity promotion stop? No. The Pledge has resisted all efforts to revert it back to the original “under God”-less version and In God We Trust is still the motto of every American, much to the dismay of the ones who don’t actually believe in or trust God.

The motto is really a false one. While monotheistic religions (such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) dominate the United States, there are still millions of Americans who don’t believe in any god, much less the Judeo-Christian God, which is the obvious reference in the phrase. The use of this phrase denies that America is made up of a diverse bunch of religions, such as Buddhism or Wiccan. And what of the people who don’t ascribe to any religion, such as atheists, agnostics, or secular humanists? They do not trust in God.

The main issue behind this is the separation of church and state. By claiming God as being behind the United States, the government is giving preference to a handful of religions over all others. This is wrong, wrong, wrong. The government should have no say in religion at all. I don’t care if the majority of Americans are God-fearing, church-going Christians. The minority has rights, too, especially the right to not be misrepresented.

The phrase E Pluribus Unum (still found on our currency, at least) implies a diverse spread of people banding together to form a single nation. That is what America is. America is Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Jewish, and secular. It’s every one of the religions (or lack thereof) that its citizens believe in. No one religion (or religion in general) should get preference simply for being the majority. If you want say that you personally trust in God, that’s great. But that shouldn’t be applied to everyone, especially when a good deal of them don’t trust in or even believe in God. This is a diverse nation, not a Christian nation.

Sphere: Related Content

Lots o’ photos

So I broke down and got a pro account at Flickr so I could put all my leet photos online. Check it out.

The last Harry

For the past eight years, I’ve read the books in the Harry Potter series. It started with my mom reading the first book to me and my sisters when I was 11. We read through the books mere weeks after they came out and anxiously awaited the next in the series. But now it’s over. I’ve read the seventh, and presumably the last, book. Now, I won’t spoil anything for those of you who haven’t read it yet. I will say, though, that it’s definitely the best in the series. J. K. Rowling did a damn fine job with this book in particular, especially considering she had the last chapter in mind before she even began writing the first book.

Anyways, now that I’ve read through the entire series, I’m at a bit of a loss. It’s all over. No more new Harry Potter books to look forward to. Sure, there are always the movies (still got two of those coming), but let’s face it, the movies just don’t do credit to the books. Indeed, it would be preferable to keep the movies shorter than LotR lengths (<4 hours), but a lot is left out when you need to fit a 800-page book into a movie. The latest movie (the fifth) is a good example of that. Where did Ron’s Quidditch successes go? What about Ron and Hermione as prefects? Why is Percy and his split from the rest of the Weasleys never mentioned or even seen (unless that’s him in Dumbledore’s office, sans horn-rimmed glasses)?

Now, I don’t mean to portray the fifth movie as an absolute failure, but it does not even come close to the book. I doubt future movies will improve on this, which makes it hard to anticipate them as much a I did the books. It’s a bit of a bummer, really, but at least I got good closure out of the last book. I’d hate it if Rowling had left off on a cliff-hanger. I get enough of that from Lost.

Sphere: Related Content




Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States