Your response to my question posted on November 9th…..still does not add up. I looked at your posted links……but none of what happened on 911 follows any kind of rational protocol… given that the whole area should have been treated as a crime scene.

And that’s my point….the 911 Commission report should have said that WTC 7 …..in their opinion….was not a target…..but they did not. Even when they were asked. They simply did address it at all.

Even a cursory examination of the 9/11 Commision Report shows a willful and arrogant indifference to the truth. The Commission chairman stated publicly that he didn’t think tracking the money that funded the attacks was “all that important”. All of the debris at Ground Zero was confiscated by Federal agents, major public figures were told not to go into the downtown area that day, firefighters, police officers and citizens heard several explosions going off before and after the towers were hit, flimsy identification papers linking al-Queda (a CIA-funded group), were found intact at Ground Zero while reinforced steel girders melted. To this day the Pentagon has released only two inconclusive videos that don’t even come close to showing a commercial jet hitting the building. Many expert’s in aeronautical engineering has agreed that debris at the Pentagon did not come from a plane of that size, no bodies or human remains of any kind were found there or on a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Throughout the entire time these attacks were under way not one single military aircraft responded. Not one single military counter-action was taken anywhere in the United States.

Silverstein, newly-aquired owner of the World Trade Center complex admitted on television that a decision was made to “pull it down” referring to Building 7. The 911 Commission Report unbelievable stated they “don’t know how” Building 7 collasped. Building 7 contained, amongst other things, sensitive information on major financial and political figures. Information that was about to be released in an upcoming Congressional investigation.

Even the most diehard, head in the sand, true blue, red-blooded all-American patriot would be scratching his head at the inconsistencies, contradictions contained in the 9/11 Commission Report as well as the subsequent responses and actions of media and government officials.

As for why the 9/11 Commission didn’t address WTC 7, that’s simple: it wasn’t the target of the terrorist attacks. The Commission focused mainly on WTC 1, WTC 2, and the Pentagon. Investigating collateral damage wasn’t on their agenda. Don’t mistake lack of an explanation for inability to explain.

Setting the two towers aside….. and Alex Jones for the moment…can anyone in here explain why the third building…. WTC 7… fell at free fall speed……with no plane involved…….a building that was conventionally constructed and designed……(in other words different than the towers)…..with one small fire contained in the building……fall into its own footprint in seconds……

Because the 911 Commission could not. Not even a opinion…..nor a subjective thought or a passing comment……why?

What truly worries me is having people in office the likes of Ron Paul that align themselves with these nutcases!

Don’t you find it ironic that the 9/11 truthers are so quick to call people “sheep”?

I can also Google and find proof contrary to what Jones says. It all depends on what one considers “proof”.

At any rate, my best guess as to how the towers collapsed based on the evidence available is this:

The impact of the airplanes into the towers severed some supports and weakened others inside the buildings. In addition, the burning jet fuel further weakened the already damaged supports (it’s important to note that I don’t think the jet fuel was the sole cause of those supports being weakened; it only exacerbated the stress caused by the impact of the plane). Eventually, those supports failed and the floors above the crash sites collapsed onto lower floors. This is known as a progressive collapse. The relatively undamaged floors beneath the crash site couldn’t take the weight of the floors falling from above and collapsed on to the floors below them. Those floors also couldn’t take the weight and collapsed. This continued all the way down, causing the towers to collapse completely. Contrary to popular belief (as shown by the information I linked to), progressive collapses aren’t extremely rare. Usually, they are the result of poor design, but I think the stress of a large airplane slamming into a building could weaken it enough to cause a similar collapse.