Monthly Archive for September, 2007

Page 2 of 3

Let’s (not) go to the circus

PETA is well known for being a mean-spirited group hell-bent on ruining life for anyone who isn’t vegan. But why did they have to expand their propaganda to include circuses? Basically, circuses are cruel. And that means that you’re cruel if you attend one, you foul, elephant-beating person.

Seriously though, there are four reasons there why parents should not take their kids to the circus. Now, not all of them are bad, but it’s the generalizations typical of anything related to PETA that really get me. Take, for instance, reason 1 in the link above: “Circuses chain‚ cage‚ and hurt animals.” This may be true in some cases, but not every circus treats its animals cruelly. And cruelty to animals is certainly no reason to cut out circuses entirely. I mean, it’s not as if there are circuses that don’t have animals. Oh wait! It says right there in one of the random quotes on the sidebar that there are non-animal circuses! What an idea!

The other odd point is number 3, which says that children want more time with their families. The writer of the piece then suggests going to see Dora Live or the Wiggles. How, may I ask, are those events any different than the circus? You’re watching a show. It may not be quality time with the kids, but you are spending time with them. Even at circuses. Point 4 is an obvious one. Other ways to learn about animals? Try the zoo. Wait, zoos are (read: can be and rarely are) cruel, too, so I guess those are out. Forget the useful information they provide about animals and conservation…

This article, fortunately, isn’t the usual stuff you’d expect from PETA. It’s not rabid, it’s not viciously pushing an agenda. It’s a (somewhat) thoughtfully written essay with kids in mind. Reading through it, there’s no place that says “Tell your kids that eating animals is a horrible thing that will make them die really young” or anything like that. The main point here is not supporting animal abuse, an issue I wholeheartedly agree with. But it still makes some huge generalizations. First off, animals are not defenseless. Someone has to go in an animal’s cage at some point, which means that animal has a perfect chance to maul or even kill the person. Lions and tigers are well-known for this, even when they’re treated fairly well. Even elephants can severely injure a person if so provoked. Wild (or even domesticated) animals are never defenseless. Secondly, few modern circuses abuse their animals. It’s bad publicity when people find out. Better to treat animals well and be praised than abuse them and risk losing customers when someone reports it. I’d even say that well-treated animals perform better than abused ones, but that’s a pretty subjective thing to say.

I just wish PETA would leave well enough alone. Yes, it’s good to let people know about animal abuse and how they can prevent it, but telling people (kids even!) not to go to the circus? Now that’s just cruel.

Alex Jones is a nutcase

Updated 6/14/10: In the interest of promoting discussion (as this is by far the most-visited post on my site), I’m reopening the comments for this post. However, keep in mind that the post is nearly three years old and contains outdated and possibly outright incorrect information. Keep it clean.

9/11 conspiracy theorists are, unfortunately, a rather common breed, especially considering they come from all political ideologies. Websites like Prison Planet don’t help, especially when they bill themselves as reporting the truth. I’m rather fond of saying that truth requires proof. Half-assed theories aren’t proof. Of course, linking to things like this on the main page of the site doesn’t help when it comes to credibility.

Anyways, who exactly is Alex Jones? He’s best known as a conspiracy theorist who runs a radio show and the aforementioned Prison Planet (I’m not giving that site the pleasure of a link). In fact, I’d say he’s one of the most vocal opponents of the official version of the events of 9/11. As for his political ideology, he’s a paleoconservative. Think Rush Limbaugh but worse. He’s so extreme it scares me to think people actually believe what he says. Now, I don’t mind conservatives, but when anyone, regardless of their political beliefs, willingly believes that the government of the United States launched missiles at its own buildings (including a government one, containing key members of the Defense Department), killed 2000 of its own civilians (2000 less people paying taxes), and yet was unable to whack the most vocal conspiracy theorists (such as the maker of Loose Change), I tend to think they’re a little crazy.

Continue reading ‘Alex Jones is a nutcase’

Never forget

Tears 9-11-01

Always remember that day.

Gay penguins and other horrible things

Banned Books Week is coming up at the end of this month (Sept. 29 through Oct. 6, 2007), which means it’s high time to be hearing about people challenging or banning books because they’re too narrow-minded to understand how censorship is bad.

Being the staunch libertarian I am, censorship really annoys me. I’m rather fond of quoting Mark Twain when he said “Censorship is like telling a man he can’t eat steak because a baby can’t chew it.” Strong, but accurate, words Mr. Twain. Books are usually challenged or banned when someone (or a group of someones) takes offense at the content of a book. Famous examples include Huckleberry Finn (use of the n-word), Catcher in the Rye (excessive obscenities), or even Of Mice and Men (promoting euthanasia), all of which were banned at some point in the United States. You’d think things would have died down in this “enlightened” day and age, but people are still weenies. Less books are banned, but there are still hundreds of challenges (formal complaints to libraries, schools, etc. regarding a book or books) each year.

A rather prominent example this year is And Tango Makes Three, a children’s book based on the true story of two male penguins raising a penguin chick. That’s right: gay penguins. Oh noes! It’s the most challenged book this year, according to the American Library Association‘s Office for Intellectual Freedom. Why? Because it apparently advocates homosexuality. First off, it’s a true story. In other words, it’s depicting real life. If you can’t handle that, I hear being a hermit and living in the forest is all the rage. Secondly, even if it’s directly advocating homosexuality, so what? I mean, surely parents wouldn’t be closed-minded enough to be scared their precious baby might turn out to be a flaming homosexual because he or she read a book about gay penguins. Come on. It’s absurd to think kids are going to turn out “wrong” because it’s okay for penguins. Open up a little. Remember how minds are like parachutes.

Anyways, what I don’t get is how parents have to ruin libraries and schools for everyone else. I suppose it’s (barely) understandable how they might want to do everyone possible to prevent their child’s mind from being “poisoned,” but they seem to lack the intelligence needed to realize that they can’t protect their kids forever. They’re going to learn about homosexuality somehow. Better that they learn about it in a positive way than that being gay is the worst possible thing ever and that they’ll go to hell if they even associate with those people. Or are they supposed to grow up hateful and closed-minded? I forget which is the family values view.

Whatever you take away from this post, boys and girls, just remember one thing: if you don’t like a book, don’t freakin’ read it. Better yet, read it first so you realize how silly you were being thinking it was an evil book (I’m talking to you, Harry Potter haters).

Internet People!

Forget searching through YouTube for the best videos. They’re all right here, lovingly animated and put to music by Dan Meth.

YouTube Preview Image

 

September 2007
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Support Wikipedia