Somehow, I imagine they would come mto this moron’s defense. Especially the effort to “expose” the ACLU; that has to come under the First Amendment, no? I would have read more, and be able to say what they’re being exposed as/for … but the writing is so horrifically boring, I just can’t bring myself to click into the rest of the story. All of the intro blurbs seem like the ending of one episode of a b-rate serial drama from the 1950s.
Somehow, I imagine they would come mto this moron’s defense. Especially the effort to “expose” the ACLU; that has to come under the First Amendment, no? I would have read more, and be able to say what they’re being exposed as/for … but the writing is so horrifically boring, I just can’t bring myself to click into the rest of the story. All of the intro blurbs seem like the ending of one episode of a b-rate serial drama from the 1950s.
I commented on a couple of the articles, but the guy running the blog is pretty combative when you question him. It’s not really worth another look.