Tag Archive for 'religion'

Good cop, bad cop

Christians are an interesting group of people. The entire Christian religion is based around the words of Jesus of Nazareth, a loving and peaceful man who spent the majority of his time with the undesirables and often criticized the establishment. He was selfless and compassionate, even to those who wished him great harm. Above all, he ranks rather high in the list of great pacifists of the world, next to Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. There was that outburst in the temple with the money changers, but hey, who doesn’t yell at those guys?

So, if Christianity is based entirely around this guy and his practices, why are Christians about the biggest bunch of hypocritical, violent, and hateful people you’ll ever meet? Please note: I’m not talking about every single Christian ever here. I’m using the view of Christianity that most non-Christians have. So any condemnation I dole out in this post is aimed at the vocal but false Christians who preach their bigotry as the real deal. Please, don’t get all pissy at me because you think I’m some militant atheist who’s out to destroy religion. If you honestly think that’s me, you haven’t read the post. Just FYI.

I’ve met a lot of Christians. Most are good Christians. They follow what Jesus said. They don’t wish anyone ill, they don’t condemn people based on their lifestyle choices, they don’t boycott movies because an atheist wrote the book the movies were based around. There are also the bad Christians. The ones who hold signs saying “Repent or burn in hell!” or claim that homosexuals are evil. It’s easy to spot the difference: good Christians lead by example; bad Christians lead by threats. In other words, a good Christian can show you his faith simply by being who he is. A bad Christian resorts to telling you you’ll go to hell for being gay/black/Jewish or daring to watch anything on TV that’s not Lifetime (or Hallmark, so long as M*A*S*H isn’t on) and then backing it up with Bible verses taken out of context. A bumper sticker I saw today summed it up nicely: “When Jesus said to love your enemies, he probably didn’t mean kill them.”

Strictly speaking, I’m not a Christian at all. I’m not even especially religious. Does this make me an atheist? Not necessarily. I won’t bother going into my religious beliefs as they are complex and completely irrelevant. What matters is that I used to be a Christian, so I know what I’m talking about. Heck, I’ve found I know more about the finer things in Christianity than some church-going Christians, which might be part of the problem. If you don’t know your chosen religion that well, how can you practice it properly? Perhaps if people paid attention to what Jesus actually said and not what they think he meant, life would be a lot nicer. We wouldn’t have to deal with those crackpots over at Westboro Baptist Church, for one thing. They’re still stuck using verses from the Old Testament. Christians should pay more attention to the teachings in the New Testament, leaving the Old Testament for history. WBC must not have gotten the memo.

I like to think that keeping my distance from Christianity has given me a more even view at the issues within it. Other people like to think that it makes me despise religion entirely. Don’t be like those people. Oversimplifying religion is one of the biggest problems here. You may happen to disagree with everything I’ve said here, and that’s fine. This blog is about my opinions, after all. I’m not expecting anyone to like them.

Sphere: Related Content

Let’s get this straight

This is the holiday season. It’s not the Christmas season. Indeed, Christmas occurs within the holiday season, but it’s not the only holiday. Both Hanukkah and Kwanzaa occur during the holiday season, as do Festivus and Chrismahanukwanzakuh. Multiple holidays = holiday season.

Honestly, I don’t care if you wish me a Merry Christmas. I happen to celebrate Christmas, so it doesn’t bother me. However, it wouldn’t much bother me if someone wished me a Happy Hanukkah, either, just because I’m pretty easy-going like that. And it certainly doesn’t bother me when people wish me Happy Holidays. They don’t know what holiday I celebrate. Maybe I’m an atheist who wouldn’t tell his kids that Santa Claus exists and would take offense at being wished Merry Christmas when I don’t celebrate it. Better to be ambiguous than offensive, wouldn’t you agree?

Seriously, though, I wish I could have one year without having to hear about people whining that they were wished Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas. There’s not just one holiday here, people. This isn’t The Hebrew Hammer and there isn’t a militant Santa trying to eliminate Hanukkah. Get over yourselves and get back to celebrating commercialism, er, I mean Jesus’s birth.

Sphere: Related Content

Take that!

I’m sure you’ve heard of the Westboro Baptist Church. Heck, I’ve even ranted about them before. Great folks, aren’t they? Got a habit of picketing the funerals of dead servicemen and servicewomen, claiming their deaths are a result of our tolerance of gays. That part is ironic enough. Clearly, they’ve never been to the South.

Anyways, someone finally up and sued them. A father of a fallen Marine sued the church for an unspecified amount of money for their invasion of the family’s privacy and “emotional distress” caused by the church picketing the Marine’s funeral. Normally I don’t like emotional distress suits (”You hurt my feelings, now give me money!”), but I think I can make an exception for this. As it is, punitive damages are doled out to prevent something from happening, and I think the amount awarded ($11 million) should discourage WBC and their “circus of hate” from ever going to Maryland again.

It should be noted that Westboro has nowhere near that amount of money. Shirley Phelps, the pastor’s daughter, had only $306 in her bank account, according to (questionable) financial papers. I wonder where they get the money for all the travel they do…

Sphere: Related Content

In God who trusts?

For a very, very long time, the official motto of the United States was E Pluribus Unum, a Latin phrase meaning “out of many, one.” In 1956, it was changed to In God We Trust, an English phrase meaning “there’s only one real religion in this country, dammit!”

This wasn’t the only religion-oriented change made in the 1950s. That was the same decade the Pledge of Allegiance gained “under God,” angering atheist kids and secular humanist parents the nation over. On the bright side, no one was required to do the Hitler (née Bellamy) salute any more (I’m serious, that’s what they did when they said the Pledge back before World War II; Wikipedia sez so). At any rate, why was Christianity so zealously promoted during these times? Easy: the Cold War. I’m certainly not the first to point out the connection, so don’t go telling people I made this all up. The common conception of the time was that Communists were evil. Soviet Russia was Communist and highly atheistic. Ergo, atheists were evil. To combat the evil, godlessness of the Communists, the United States promoted Christianity, ostensibly to show the world that America was the source of everything good, such as apple pie and Playboy, because we had God on our side.

History will record that Russia disintegrated and America won the Cold War. But did the Christianity promotion stop? No. The Pledge has resisted all efforts to revert it back to the original “under God”-less version and In God We Trust is still the motto of every American, much to the dismay of the ones who don’t actually believe in or trust God.

The motto is really a false one. While monotheistic religions (such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) dominate the United States, there are still millions of Americans who don’t believe in any god, much less the Judeo-Christian God, which is the obvious reference in the phrase. The use of this phrase denies that America is made up of a diverse bunch of religions, such as Buddhism or Wiccan. And what of the people who don’t ascribe to any religion, such as atheists, agnostics, or secular humanists? They do not trust in God.

The main issue behind this is the separation of church and state. By claiming God as being behind the United States, the government is giving preference to a handful of religions over all others. This is wrong, wrong, wrong. The government should have no say in religion at all. I don’t care if the majority of Americans are God-fearing, church-going Christians. The minority has rights, too, especially the right to not be misrepresented.

The phrase E Pluribus Unum (still found on our currency, at least) implies a diverse spread of people banding together to form a single nation. That is what America is. America is Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Jewish, and secular. It’s every one of the religions (or lack thereof) that its citizens believe in. No one religion (or religion in general) should get preference simply for being the majority. If you want say that you personally trust in God, that’s great. But that shouldn’t be applied to everyone, especially when a good deal of them don’t trust in or even believe in God. This is a diverse nation, not a Christian nation.

Sphere: Related Content

Harry Potter is not evil

For once, I couldn’t think of a clever title. Oh well. This one’s straight and to the point. Anyways, as any long-time fan of Harry Potter knows, the boy is pure evil. You heard me right. He’s a wizard and he goes to a school devoted to teaching witchcraft and wizardry. That makes him evil. Why? Well, somewhere in the Bible (I have yet to find where), there’s a passage saying that practicing magic in any form is a big no-no. Why? Well…er, I don’t know. Having not read the passage, I can’t really say why, but I bet it has something to do with not invoking power through God. Come to think of it, that really may be the reason. I once wrote to some lady who was on a vendetta against Harry Potter and her email back said something to that effect. But with more “Repent lest ye be damned!” and such. Apparently, daring to question someone who has (or thinks they have) God and the Bible on their side is even worse than reading about Harry Potter.

While I can kind of understand how some religious people can see magic as being “bad” (if only because their religion says so), I don’t think they quite get the big picture regarding Harry Potter. Heck, I highly doubt most of the hardcore anti-Harry folks have even read the books. See, Harry Potter is all about the dichotomy of good vs. evil. Sound familiar? Yeah, it’s in the Bible, too. Good wins, evil doesn’t. Old hat. So why does magic throw a wrench into the whole deal? Yes, Harry Potter practices magic. But do you see him using for anything other than good? Okay, he’s lost his temper a few times and performed a forbidden curse at least once, but that’s nothing compared to guys like Voldemort and his crew of Death Eaters. Does Harry murder? Does he torture? Does he inflict unimaginable pain on wizards and Muggles alike for amusement? No, of course not. Because he’s good. Voldemort does do these things because he’s bad. See what I’m getting at here?

Continue reading ‘Harry Potter is not evil’

Sphere: Related Content




Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States